You are currently viewing Strong Argumentative Essay Examples, Analyzed

Are you required to present your viewpoint about a topic? Argumentative essays are among the most well-known kinds of essays you’ll be writing in the classroom. They blend persuasive arguments with evidence-based research. when executed correctly they can be effective instruments to convince someone to accept your point of viewpoint. If you’re having trouble writing an argumentative essay or would like to know how to write them better, viewing examples could be a huge aid.

After providing an outline of the kind composition, we offer three examples of argumentative essays. Following the essay is completed, we go over in depth what the paper was written as well as what was successful and how the essay can be enhanced. We conclude with tips to help you make your own argumentative essay as convincing as it can be.

What Is an Argumentative Essay?

Argumentative essays are one which relies on evidence and facts to prove the point it is making. Its goal is to persuade readers to believe the argument being presented.

A well-constructed argumentative essay is one that relies on facts and evidence to prove the argument instead of relying on the writer’s views and opinions. As an example, let’s say you’re planning to compose an argumentative essay that argues the fact that Charleston, SC is a excellent location for families. It’s not enough to say it’s a great spot because you and your family went there and loved it. In order to make it an argumentative piece you must have facts and figures to support your arguments, like the variety of family-friendly places in Charleston and special offers that you can avail with children as well as surveys of people who have visited Charleston with their families and loved the trip. The primary argument is based on emotions, while the second one is founded on facts that is proven.

The five-paragraph format is a common one, however it’s is not mandatory for arguments in essays. The majority of these essays use either that of the Toulmin models or Rogerian model.

  • It is the Toulmin method is one of the more well-known. It starts with an introduction, then follows by a thesis/claim and provides data and evidence to support the assertion. This kind of writing also contains arguments that are rebutted.
  • The Rogerian model considers two arguments and comes to a conclusion by taking into account both the advantages and disadvantages of both.

3 Good Argumentative Essay Examples + Analysis

Here are 3 examples of persuasive essays composed by my self during my time at school along with an review of what each one did well and how it could be improved.

Argumentative Essay Example 1

As the use of online learning grows more widespread and increasing numbers of sources are being converted to digital formats, some have suggested that libraries in public should be closed and instead, every person should have the iPad with an electronic-reader subscription.

People who support this idea claim that it could help local towns and cities save cost since libraries are costly to run. They also believe that it will inspire readers to read more because they don’t need to go to a library to purchase books; they’ll be able to just click on what they’d like to read and access it anywhere they happen to be. Additionally, they can have access to more books since libraries will not have to purchase physical copies of their books; they’ll be able to rent the number of digital copies they require.

But, it is the wrong choice to substitute libraries by tablets. First of all, digital books and other resources are correlated with lower learning and have more issues than print-based resources. A study on the book and tablet reading discovered that people read between 20 and 30 percent less quickly on their tablets. They also remember 20% less information and comprehend only 10% about what they are reading when compared to those reading the exact material in print. Furthermore, spending too much time staring at screens has been proven to be a cause of numerous health issues such as disorientation, blurred vision headaches, dry eyes and eye strain at more frequent times than reading a printed book. People who make use of mobile and tablets for a long time are also more likely to be the victims of health issues that are more severe like fibromyalgia, back pain and shoulder and carpal tunnel syndrome or muscle strain. I am aware that when I am reading on my e-reader for a long time my eyes start to get tired and my neck is aching. We shouldn’t create more of these issues by offering people, particularly young people, additional reasons to be distracted by screens.

The second reason is that it’s extremely preposterous to believe that the only thing libraries provide is lending books. Libraries offer a myriad of benefits, and some are only available when they have an actual place. A few of these advantages are that they can be used as a tranquil study area, providing people with the opportunity to talk with their fellow patrons, offering classes covering a wide range of subjects as well as providing employment, responding to questions from patrons, as well as keeping people together. One community found that following the introduction of local libraries, community activities like playtimes for children and their parents as well as job fairs for teens and meeting rooms for older adults, more than one third of residents said they were having a greater sense of belonging to the local community. Similar to this to this, a Pew survey that was conducted in 2015 revealed that almost half of American adults believe that closing their library would have a huge impact on their local community. Libraries are seen as a place to meet people and to get answers to their questions but tablets aren’t able to provide quite as effectively or quickly.

Although the idea of replacing libraries with tablets could seem like a simple option but it could make people spend more time on electronic screens despite numerous problems that surround them. Also, it would end access to the benefits that libraries are accustomed to. In many places libraries play such an essential component of the community network that they can’t be replaced with a single object.

Analysis

The writer begins by providing an explanation of counter argument and then the thesis is introduced in the opening sentence of the 3rd paragraph. The essay continues to spend the remainder of the essay deconstructing the counter argument and demonstrating why readers should accept the opposing side.

This essay is a success because it:

  • While it’s not the most common to include the thesis quite early in the essay, it’s a good idea since, after the thesis is established then the rest of the essay will be focused on defending it, since the counter argument has been addressed earlier in the essay.
  • The article is full of facts and references to studies to back up its arguments. With specific information to base their argument on the argument of the writer is more convincing and readers are more likely to be able to accept the argument.
  • Every argument the opposing side presents it is the author’s responsibility to disprove the argument and then explain what she believes is the more logical one. To present an argument that is strong it’s essential to take down the opposing side. the essay accomplishes in a way that makes the writer’s position appear more convincing.

What could be improved

  • This is a paper that is shorter and, if needed to be extended to satisfy length specifications, it can include more examples and go in-depth with them, for instance in describing specific instances where people have benefited from local libraries.
  • Furthermore, although the article includes a large amount of information, the writer also discusses their own experiences when using tablets. This is a mistake because argumentative essays are based on facts and evidence to prove a point and not on the author’s personal opinions or experience. The replacement of that information with more data regarding health concerns that are related to screen time would enhance the argument.
  • Certain of the claims mentioned aren’t 100% true, especially the claim regarding digital books being more affordable. It is often costly for libraries more money to rent many electronic copies of books, compared to purchasing a single physical copy. Be sure that in your essay that you do your research on all of the arguments and rebuttals that you write, otherwise it will appear as if you don’t have a thorough understanding of the issue.

Argumentative Essay Example 2

Malaria is a disease that can be transmitted caused by parasites which are passed on to people by the female Anopheles mosquitoes. Every year, more than 50 million people contract malaria, with about 80percent of them within Sub-Saharan Africa. About half a million suffer from malaria each year mostly young children who are less than five. Contrary to other infections that kill people, the number of deaths from malaria is increasing. There have been a variety of initiatives designed to increase the availability of malaria treatments, the best method to limit the effects on malaria patients in Sub-Saharan Africa is to focus on decreasing the number of people who contract malaria initially rather than being patient and treating the illness after someone has already contracted the disease.

There are a variety of treatment options for malaria and many are effective and can help save lives, however programs to eradicate malaria that concentrate too much on these drugs and do not focus sufficient attention to prevention hasn’t achieved long-term results across Sub-Saharan Africa. One of the most important programs to fight malaria was the WHO’s Global Malaria Eradication Programme. It was launched in 1955 and set the goal of ending malaria from Africa over the course of 10 years. Following on from successful programs from Brazil as well as the United States, the program concentrated on the control of vectors. It included widespread distribution of chloroquine as well as spraying huge amounts of DDT. More than a billion dollars was spent to eliminate malaria. But, the program was plagued from a variety of issues and, in the year 1969 WHO admitted that it did not succeed in eliminating malaria. It was discovered that the number from Sub-Saharan Africa who contracted malaria and the number of deaths from malaria were actually increasing by more than 10% in the period that the program was running.

One of the main reason for the demise of the project was the fact that it established standard policies and strategies. Because it didn’t take into account the differences between the different governments, geographical regions as well as infrastructure requirements, the project wasn’t as effective as it could be. Sub-Saharan Africa has neither the funds nor the infrastructure to afford such a plan, which means it can’t be operated in the manner it was intended to. The majority of African nations don’t have the money to send everyone to a doctor for shots, and they don’t have the funds to afford to clean up wetlands or other areas that are malaria-prone. The cost per person for the continent for eliminating malaria was one-quarter of the amount Brazil did. Sub-Saharan Africa simply can’t rely on a strategy that requires more money, infrastructure and know-how than they can spare.

In addition, the widespread use of chloroquine has led to resistant parasites to drugs that are currently threatening Sub-Saharan Africa. Since chloroquine was widely used however inconsistently, mosquitoes developed resistance to it, and chloroquine is currently almost completely ineffective within Sub-Saharan Africa, with over 90% of mosquitoes being resistant to chloroquine. This means that newer and more expensive medications must be utilized to treat and prevent malaria, which drives up the cost of malaria treatment in the region that cannot be able to afford it.

Instead of focusing on strategies to treat malaria after the illness has occurred the victim, efforts should be focused on preventing malaria from occurring from the beginning. This strategy is not just less expensive and more efficient, decreasing the amount of people afflicted with malaria also decreases the loss of school and work days that can decrease the efficiency of the area.

One of the least expensive and most effective methods of stopping malaria is to use mosquito nets treated with insecticides (ITNs). These nets create a layer around the those who use the nets. While bed nets without treatment are useful, those which are treated by insecticides can be better because they keep mosquitoes from stinging people with the nets. They also aid in reducing mosquito populations within the community, which helps people who don’t have nets for their beds. Bed nets can also be efficient because the majority of bites from mosquitoes occur when the person is sleeping, and so bed nets can be used to significantly reduce the number of transmissions at night. In reality, the transmission of malaria could be cut by up to 90 percent in areas where use of ITNs is commonplace. Because of the scarcity of money and scarce in Sub-Saharan Africa, the low cost of ITNs is an enormous advantage and is a key reason as to why the program is extremely successful. Bed nets are about two dollars to create last for several years and are able to provide protection to two adults. Research has shown that for every 100 to 1000 nets are in use 1 less child is dying from malaria. With around 300 million people living in Africa not covered by mosquito nets it is possible to save three million lives for just a few dollars each person.

Reduced numbers of people suffering from malaria could also lower the level of poverty in Africa dramatically, which would improve various aspects of the society such as education levels and the economic situation. Vector controls are more efficient than other treatment methods since it means that less people are suffering from illness. If fewer people are sick the population of people who work is more robust as a whole since they are not forced out of work because of malaria nor are they caring for their sick relatives. Families with malaria typically get 40% of the vegetables that healthy families pick. Furthermore, a family with members suffering from malaria pays around a quarter of their income on treatment, which doesn’t include the loss of employment they face because of the disease. The cost of malaria is estimated to be Africa 12 billion dollars in lost earnings every year. A large and active population means an economic boom, something that Sub-Saharan Africa is in desperate in need of.

Analysis

The essay begins with an introduction that is concluded with the main idea (that plans to eradicate malaria for Sub-Saharan Africa should focus on prevention, not treatment). The initial part of the essay explores the reason why the other argument (treatment instead of prevention) isn’t as efficient as it could be. The second part of the essay examines how prevention of malaria is the best route to follow.

The essay’s strengths are:

  • The thesis is presented at the beginning of the essay, it is clearly stated and is supported throughout the the essay. This makes the argument easy for readers to comprehend and follow through the essay.
  • There’s plenty of reliable research in this article which includes specific programs and projects and the extent to which they succeeded in addition to specific research data that are that are mentioned throughout. This research helps to strengthen the argument of the writer.

What could be improved

  • The author makes a case in favor of the use of bed nets in a larger way rather than waiting until malaria develops and starting treatment, but no plan is offered for how bed nets are distributed or how to be sure they’re used correctly. If she could provide more details of the way she believes it is needed in the future, the author is giving a more convincing argument.
  • The introduction to the essay does an excellent job of detailing the seriousness of the issue however the conclusion is brief and abrupt. The idea of extending it into a separate paragraph could give the writer the chance to make readers believe in her position.

Argumentative Essay Example 3

Since college sports continue to be hugely popular, and as the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates large sums of money, many have been reviving the debate over the issue of whether athletes from colleges should be paid.

There are numerous ways in which payments can be made. They could take an arrangement that is a free market method, in which athletes can earn whatever they want the market to pay, which could be a fixed amount per athlete or student athletes could earn money through endorsements, autographs and the control of their appearance as is the case with how the top Olympians earn a living.

People who support this belief believe that because college athletes are those who are training, playing in games and bringing audiences that they deserve some form of payment for their efforts. If there weren’t any college athletes and the NCAA would not exist, and college coaches would not earn (sometimes extremely excessive) salary, and even brands such as Nike would not be able to profit by promoting college sport. Actually the NCAA generates roughly $1 billion in revenues each year, yet college athletes do not receive the money through paychecks. In addition, those who believe that college athletes should receive a salary claim they believe that paying their college students would be a good incentive for them to stay in the college for longer and will not be able to make the transition as fast in the first place, whether by offering them an opportunity to start earning money at college or by forcing that they sign an agreement that states they will remain at the school for a specific amount of time while earning the agreed-upon wage.

People who support this notion refer at Zion Williamson, the Duke basketball star who, in his first year at Duke, suffered an injury to his knee that was severe. Many believed that, regardless of how much he enjoyed playing for Duke but it was not worth the risk of sustaining another injury and end his career before it had even begun for a team that was not paying him. Williamson appears to have agreed with them, and declared his eligibility to the NCAA draft in the following year. If he had been paid, he could have been at Duke for a longer time. In fact, around three-quarters of the student athletes interviewed said that receiving the salary they earned while at college could make them “strongly consider” remaining collegiate athletes for longer than they would before going pro.

It is also possible to prevent the recruiting scandals which have afflicted the NCAA. In 2018 the NCAA took away the Louisville University’s men’s basketball team of their National championship trophy in 2013 because it was discovered that coaches employed sex workers to lure recruits into joining the team. There have been numerous other scandals in the recruitment process where college athletes and students were bribed with anything from having their grade altered, to obtaining free cars, or being bribed straight to the point. By giving college athletes money and making their wages publicly available and publically, the NCAA could stop the illegal and shady ways that certain schools and coaches attempt to lure athletes into joining.

Many who are against the notion to pay college sports stars that the practice is a disaster for the sport of college. If athletes were paid according to them, it could transform college sports into an auction, in which only the most wealthy schools can have the money to pay top athletes as well as the vast majority of colleges are shut out of building a strong team (though certain people believe that this already is the case because the top players tend to be at the top of the established sports teams in the college that generally give their coaches millions of dollars each year). This could also harm the tight bonding of a lot of college teams in the event that players feel jealous certain teammates are earning more money than they do.

They also claim that the fact that college athletes are paid isn’t enough. Only a small portion will earn substantial income. Of the 350 Division I athletic departments, less than a dozen make any kind of revenue. Most of the money the NCAA generates is from basketball and football for men as such, and paying college athletes could create a small number of players–who are likely to be recruited by professional teams and start making millions right away from college–richer at the expense other players.

People who are against paying college athletes believe that athletes receive sufficient benefits already. The top athletes already receive scholarships that are worth tens of thousands per year, they receive free food/housing/textbooks, have access to top medical care if they are injured, receive top coaching, get travel perks and free gear, and can use their time in college as a way to capture the attention of professional recruiters. The other college students don’t receive the amount of money from their institutions.

The people on this side note that while the NCAA earns a huge amount of money every year, it’s an organization that is non-profit. How? Since over 95 percent of those earnings are distributed to its member institutions as conferences, scholarships, grants and assistance to Division II teams, Division III team, as well as educational programs. The loss of a large portion of this revenue could hurt programs with smaller budgets that depend on this money to continue operating.

Although both sides have their good points, the disadvantages of paying college athletes are far more significant than the benefits. College athletes devote a large amount of their time and energy for their school, however they’re compensated by the perks and scholarships they get. A salary increase could result in an sports system in which only the top 1% of athletes (those likely to make millionaires in professional leagues) receive a salary from only a few schools that participate in bidding battles to find players, whereas the majority of the student athletics and athletic teams at colleges are hampered or shut down due to lack of funds. Continued offering the current benefits for students makes it possible for everyone to enjoy and benefit from college sports as is possible.

Analysis

The argumentative essay outlined here follows an argumentative essay that follows the Rogerian model. The essay discusses both sides beginning by laying out the many reasons why students believe they ought to be paid, before explaining the reasons why they should not be compensated. It concludes by saying the college athlete shouldn’t get paid in the belief that paying them could harm the college athletics program and lead to several of the issues that professional leagues face.

This essay is a success because it:

  • Both sides are well-constructed, and there are numerous reasons to agree with both sides. The book allows readers to understand complete understanding of the debate and the nuances.
  • Certain assertions from both sides are immediately rejected in order to demonstrate both the strength and weakness of both sides are and to give the most complete and an in-depth look at the arguments.

How can this essay be improved

  • The Rogerian model isn’t always easy because you typically don’t make your case until the conclusion of the essay. The thesis in this case isn’t revealed until the very first sentence in the final paragraph. This doesn’t allow readers the time they need to convince them you’re the correct one, in contrast to a paper in which the thesis is presented at the first paragraph and is then is supported throughout the entire paper. The paper could be improved by having the last paragraph expanded to better explain the reasons why the author believes in the argument or if the paper was clearer about the pay of athletes was not the strongest argument all through.

Tips for Writing a Good Argumentative Essay

1) Pre-Write/Outline

  • There aren’t many parts of writing that are as feared like the outline. It can be a bit overwhelming and seem like a waste of time, however, it is actually the best way to ensure you don’t lose the focus of your paper and helps keep your essay organized throughout and generally makes it much easier to sit down to write an essay.
  • It doesn’t matter which form your outline will take so long as it’s specific about the elements you’d like to include and in which order. To determine your major elements prior to drafting ensures that you stay on the right track and makes transitions much easier and more effective.

2) Be sure to begin every paragraph with a topical sentence.

  • A topic sentence Should Make the claim or point you are making in your paragraph
    • Examples: Carroll uses Alice’s conversation with the Cheshire Cat about madness both to provide a rational explanation of how the universe works in Wonderland and to criticize the Victorian focus on facts and logic.
  • A topic sentence shouldn’t include a description, summary or general background details.
    • Example Example: In Alice in Wonderland, Alice has a conversation with the Cheshire Cat about madness.

3) Be sure that every sentence (and that is, each paragraph) is directly related to your thesis assertion.

  • Every topic phrase should state what the purpose of the paragraph is relevant to the overall argument
    • e. For instance, if your thesis asserts it is true that Alice in Wonderlandcritiques Victorian education for children performing x and y, then every sentence in each of your body paragraphs must be able an underlying connection to Victorian education and/or x and/or y.
  • If your paragraph isn’t connected directly to the thesis you’re pursuing, you might consider the possibility of incorporating it into a different one or eliminating it completely
    • If you are writing about. You might choose to write about for instance, you might want to discuss the White Hare as a symbol for Victorian obsession with time. However, if the paper in its entirety is concerned with paragraphs or passages that challenge Victorian education, it’s not appropriate and can only distract your essay’s subject matter.

4) Make effective passages to connect paragraphs

  • Transitions should be used to mark a connection/opposition between a previous point and your current one
    • Connection:
      • Paragraph A: discusses Alice’s encounter with the caterpillar.
      • The transition to paragraph B Similar to Paragraph B:, Alice meets a different creature, The Cheshire Cat, with whom as the caterpillar she engages in a conversation that has more significance for the setting in the story.
    • Opposition:
      • Paragraph A: explains how the craziness of Wonderland criticizes the facts-based Victorian England
      • Moving from Paragraph B. Even despite its nature as madness as well as this disdain for facts and order There is a sort of logic in Wonderland that is deliberately irrational.
    • Note: These are just two examples of ways to include transitions in your essay There are plenty of other ways to achieve this. Whatever method you choose to use the transition should in a way establish the connection between the previous part of your writing and that which you’re about discuss.

5) Re-read your essay!

  • Many of the issues that can hinder flow are minor enough to be spotted easily by proofreading-i.e. sentences, sentence fragments, awkward/long sentences or sentences, etc.
  • The act of reading your paper loud is particularly useful for making sense of awkward words and sentences.

Summary: Argumentative Essay Sample

Argumentative essays are essays which use evidence and facts to back their position on the argument. The majority of argumentative essays adhere to either one of two models: the Toulmin models or Rogerian model. If you study good argumentsative essay examples you will be able to learn how to structure your essay and give sufficient evidence to help readers accept your view. While writing an essay be sure to be clear about your argument be sure to show where the other aspect can be weak and support your argument with facts and proof.